“Verified” is this site’s load-bearing word, so here is exactly what it costs a number to earn it — and why most numbers here are still labeled “pending” instead.
The protocol, step by step
A figure becomes verified only through direct observation: we walk the provider’s actual checkout to the point of purchase for each published plan, at maintenance dose, not the teaser tier — entry-dose pricing is where this market hides. We enumerate the full stack: medication, membership or subscription fees, provider/consult fees, shipping, and any mandatory add-ons, so the published number is the all-in monthly a real customer pays. We capture term structures separately (month-to-month versus 6/12-month locks), record cancellation and refund terms as written, screenshot everything, and date-stamp the figure — every verified number on this site carries its capture date, currently 2026-08-20 for the sole completed provider. Where a claim can’t be observed directly (states served, clinician model), it’s attributed as a claim, not laundered into fact.
What disqualifies a number
We do not publish: advertised prices we couldn’t reach in checkout; entry-tier rates presented as ongoing costs; “from” prices without an observable path; or any figure whose fee stack we couldn’t fully enumerate. When a provider’s flow blocks observation short of payment, the row stays pending and says why. The absence of a number is information.
Freshness and re-checks
Prices move, so verification decays: verified figures are re-checked on a scheduled cycle and re-dated on every pass; material changes trigger a changelog entry, and archived snapshots live at the pricing archive so past claims stay auditable. A stale date is your cue to double-check us — and our cue that a re-verification is due.
The queue, honestly
Status today: NexLife — verified 2026-08-20 (our disclosed partner, held to this same protocol, dates and screenshots retained). Pending, in queue order: Mochi Health, Ro, Hims, Henry Meds, Orderly Meds, Hers, Found, Remedy Meds, Shed, Fifty 410. Each verification is a manual, hours-long pass — we’d rather run ten honest audits slowly than paste eleven marketing pages quickly. Providers can accelerate their own row by sending current checkout documentation via contact; it gets them a faster audit, not a better one.
The conflict, handled in the open
Yes: the one verified provider is the one that pays us. That’s the sequencing reality of a new site with a disclosed partner, not a verdict — and the protocol is the control: identical steps, identical disclosure, identical exposure to correction. When pending rows fill, they publish under exactly these rules, whichever way the numbers fall. Judge us on whether the method holds, and use corrections ruthlessly when it doesn’t.
Verify us
Every mechanism above generates artifacts you can check: dates on figures, changelogs on changes, archives on history, named trials in the library, and a public rubric. Trust built any other way in this market is just marketing with better manners.